Trove Markets confirmed it will retain funds from a token sale originally marketed for integration with Hyperliquid, despite shifting its perpetual decentralized exchange to Solana days before its token launch, according to statements from the company.
Summary
- The TROVE token plunged roughly 95% on debut, sparking backlash from contributors over the repurposing of funds.
- Trove said retained proceeds would fund development, salaries, infrastructure, and marketing, issuing partial refunds to some participants
- Critics questioned the fund handling, raising trust and legal concerns, while on-chain analysis noted concentrated wallet activity in the presale that warranted scrutiny.
The TROVE token plunged approximately 95% within minutes of trading launch, following the platform pivot announced shortly before the token generation event.
The company raised funds through a public token sale to build a perpetual decentralized exchange using Hyperliquid’s infrastructure. Days before the scheduled token generation event, the team announced a pivot to Solana, raising questions among contributors about the disposition of raised funds.
Trove stated it would retain a substantial portion of the proceeds to continue development on Solana, describing the decision as necessary to maintain product viability.
A Trove builder identified as Unwise attributed the pivot to the withdrawal of a key liquidity partner who had previously supported the Hyperliquid integration with a significant position, according to public statements. The team stated that without this support, continuing development on Hyperliquid was no longer feasible, prompting the decision to rebuild the perpetual exchange on Solana.
In social media statements, Trove acknowledged that its handling of the initial coin offering and subsequent decisions caused confusion and eroded trust among participants. The company stated it had issued refunds to some participants and planned additional automatic refunds. Remaining funds have been allocated or spent on developer salaries, frontend and backend infrastructure, a chief technology officer, advisory services, marketing, and operating costs, according to the company.
Some participants questioned the repurposing of funds raised specifically for Hyperliquid development. Critics called for refunds and raised the possibility of legal action.
On-chain analysis suggested a single entity appeared to control a notable portion of TROVE supply across multiple wallets funded through the same exchange within concentrated time periods, according to blockchain analysts. The analysis found no direct evidence linking the wallets to the Trove team, but noted the pattern warranted scrutiny regarding presale activity.
The controversy follows complications during the January initial coin offering. Trove initially announced the sale exceeded its target and committed to pro-rata refunds. The company then announced a five-day extension before reversing the decision hours later, citing an error.
